Thursday, July 14, 2011

Obama Should Leave the Table

President Barack Obama needs to end negotiations immediately. The time for talk is over. It is time to get a deal done and it is clear these individuals can’t get agree on anything. We are at a point where saving face is as important as getting a credible deal done. It is time to move on.

When everyone convenes Thursday, the president should tell all in attendance that he appreciates their effort, but there is not enough time to put together a deal that addresses the deficit and inflicts the least amount of pain on Americans. He should say he will only accept an unconditional increase in the debt ceiling.

He should say after he receives this authority, he will submit the findings of his deficit commission to Congress in legislative form. The recommendations provide for a balanced approach to the deficit everyone seeks. The recommendations enjoyed bipartisan support and will then be the starting point for new negotiations

He should then publicly announce his decision and instruct his staff to prepare for the United States to default if Republicans reject him.

It is not the perfect solution but everybody wins in the end.

Interesting Read

Top Republicans Clash over Debt-Limit Plan
By Paul Kane and Lori Montgomery
The Washington Post

With no Debt Deal, Obama Would Face Tough Choices Aug. 3 About What Bills to Pay
By Zachary A. Goldfarb
The Washington Post

Warning to Washington: Don’t Mess with the Debt Ceiling
By Bill Gross
The Washington Post

Debt talks blow up: The August debt ceiling showdown breaks along two fronts: the political forces of 2010 vs. 2012.
By: David Rogers
Politico

GOP lacks a lead Messenger : Republicans are searching for a national figure who can go toe to toe with Barack Obama.
By: Jake Sherman
Politico

Cantor risks overplaying hand: He faces consequences both if debt negotiations fail or if he cuts a soft deal with the president.
By: Jonathan Allen
Politico

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Danger Lurking as Deficit Drama Continues

The drama surrounding the deficit reduction talks is not a good sign for domestic programs. With Republicans dug against tax increases the underlying question in the current stalemate is: who will blink first?

For supporters of domestic spending it doesn’t matter. In the end, domestic programs, including housing, will take it on the chin. How serious a blow these programs will receive won’t be resolved until the deficit discussion is completed. Until an agreement is reached, all discussions on a FY 2012 budget are in hold.

Therefore, it is not a surprise that the House Transportation-HUD Appropriations Subcommittee cancelled this week’s mark-up of a FY 2012 appropriations bill. After the deficit reduction numbers are agreed to, the real budget will be determined. While the devil is in the details, the parameters of deficit deal are unlikely to favor domestic programs.

By standing firm in their commitment to no new taxes Republicans have put themselves in a no-win situation. They seem to believe they have the leverage and that President Barack Obama is going to blink and accede to their demands before the deadline arrives.

The substance of a potential deal and its political subplot will one day make a writer rich! House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) is clearly not in charge of the House Republicans. Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) has positioned himself as the real power in the House. His actions are reminding the Speaker his hold on the speaker’s chair is a tenuous one. Cantor is a fiscal hawk who is championing efforts to reduce federal spending.

The president has looked weak at times appearing to bow to Republican demands. He has made extraordinary concessions by offering to reduce federal domestic spending and making significant cuts and changes to Medicare and Social Security. While these concessions are fiscally necessary, they seem to have strengthened the resolve of Republicans. He has become more assertive with Republicans accept some tax increases; however, it may be too little too late.

For housing providers, regulatory relief provides the only reasonable course of action to weather this fiscal storm. However, if it occurs, it will happen too late to have a reasonable impact on day-to-day operations. Public housing organizations are seeking both regulatory relief from Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations and increased flexibility in the structure and use of housing vouchers. While there is some support in Congress for these measures, the pace is not happening quickly enough.

Additionally, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is using it administrative authority to reduce the reserve accounts of PHAs. PHAs use these reserve funds for operating expenses and, in some cases, to offset debt on capital expenditure. As much as agencies and their representative may disagree with HUD’s action, as long as they are dependent on the Federal government for funding, they have little recourse available to them.

These tough fiscal times should force all federally dependent groups to reevaluate what they are doing and how they are funded. Innovation will be the key in determining who survives in the future.

Chamber of Commerce Releases Survey Results

The United States Chamber of Commerce released the results of its second quarterly Small Business Survey which found that small business owners rank economic uncertainty as their number one concern.

Over 1,400 business owners were asked to identify their most pressing challenges and economic uncertainty topped the list followed by debt and deficit reduction, the health care law which was passed and over-regulation. A copy of the report can be found here.

Survey Points to Some Good/Bad Signs in Local Communities

The National League of Cities released a survey which shows progress in some sectors of local communities during the recession although residential property values continue to fall.

NLC recently released the responses to the Local Economic Conditions survey which tracks the impact of the recession on local communities. The survey is the first in a multi-year tracking effort on how the recession has affected local communities and to identify areas which mirror national indicators. The purpose of the survey series is to provide a parallel track to NLC’s 25-year survey on City Fiscal Conditions.

Among the findings:

• 45 percent of the respondents report the retail sector improving.
• 28 percent report that business permits and licenses are improving.
• 35 percent report increased investments in infrastructure and capital projects in the last six months.
• 51 percent report that residential property values have worsened.
• 44 percent report commercial property values have fallen.
• 41 percent report demand for survival services such as food banks and shelters has worsened.

The following areas were identified as most important to generate economic growth:

• small business development (54 percent);
• transportation infrastructure (49 percent);
• education/workforce training (31 percent); and,
• Housing and neighborhood development (25 percent).

A copy of the report can be found here.

HUD Releases Study of Fair Housing Initiative

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) released the findings of a study of its Fair Housing Initiative Program (FHIP). The study, the first of its kind in the 15 years of the program, found that the program is successful in reducing the burden of governments at all levels in investigating complaints and that complaints filtered through the program are more likely to result in a binding legal resolution, conciliation or cause finding. The study can be found here.

Interesting Read

House GOP Not Ready to Blink on Debt
Quite Simply There is No Deficit-Reduction Proposal on the Table That Will Satisfy House Republicans.

By: Jake Sherman and Jonathan Allen
Politico

Obama Exploits Boehner-Cantor Rift
The President Has Managed to Exploit the Fragile Relationship that Exists Between the Two GOPers.

By: Jonathan Allen and Jake Sherman
Politico

In Senate, politics trump substance
By: Manu Raju
Politico

Why Obama's pushing for a mega-deal
By David Gergen
CNN

As Easy as ABC
Moving on from Mitch McConnell.

By William Kristol
The Weekly Standard

Debt-Limit Harakiri
Mitch McConnell isn't selling out Republicans

The Wall Street Journal

The President's Jobs Plan (Not)
By Robert Reich
The Huffington Post

Waiting for the Enemy to Blink on the Debt Limit
By Wesley Pruden
The Washington Times

Small Business Needs Big Boost
By Scott Brown
The Boston Herald

How Kevin McCarthy Wrangles the Tea Party in Washington
By Robert Draper
The New York Times

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Pressure Heating Up on Deficit Talks

Now that President Barack Obama is more directly involved in the discussions to negotiate an agreement on deficit reduction, the pressure is building on all sides to bend before the nation’s debt ceiling needs to be lifted more than a month from now.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s (R-VA) decision to abruptly pull out of the talks in objection to potential tax increases does more to absolve him of any responsibility for an agreement he and his conservative allies oppose than it does to bring both parties closer together. Cantor can read the writing on the wall. House and Senate Republicans have expressed a willingness to explore the elimination of corporate tax loopholes and cuts to defense spending in order to reach a compromise with the president and Democrats.

Cantor fancies himself as a leader of the House conservative movement. As the point person for the House in these talks, he cannot be perceived as compromising on the no tax increase pledge. By agreeing, or even the perception he has agreed to, anything which looks like a tax increase could damage his credibility among conservatives. Cantor certainly has aspirations to become Speaker of the House one day and would prefer to have the current Speaker, John Boehner (R-OH), take the fall.

While there are many Republicans who would be happy to allow the federal government to default, they cannot afford to be seen as the cause for the failure to reach an agreement. Republicans are more concerned about scoring political points than reaching a reasonable compromise. Such a position is selfish and irresponsible. A reasonable deficit reduction plan cannot be achieved by simply reducing domestic programs and making adjustments to Medicare and Social Security. A balanced approach is required.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) must also be careful. He can ill afford to lose any Republican votes in the Senate. Reasonable minds will eventually prevail. It is hard to believe anyone will actually allow the government to default on its obligations.

Those seeking to preserve domestic spending should be encouraged by the inclusion of defense cuts in the mix. Cuts to the defense budget may limit the depth of reductions to domestic programs and could pave the way for an agreement. However, it doesn’t lessen the impact cuts will have on domestic programs. It does, however, illustrate how serious both sides of the aisle are in finding ways to reduce the federal deficit.

States Seek Ways to Respond to Stagnant Economy and Reduce Federal Aid

The United State Chamber of Commerce released its second study looking at ways in which states are seeking to create policies and practices which help businesses, stimulates job growth and increase state revenue.

Enterprising States 2011 Recovery and Renewal for the 21st Century, looks at ways in which states are responding to the new economic environment. While the specific actions vary from state-to-state, the report finds that states are redesigning themselves, reducing spending, and revising their tax codes and policies. The report also pointed out that have fared best have fostered a “business-friendly” environment. These states also invested in new infrastructure and in education and training.

Mayors Release Report on U.S. Metro Economies

The United States Conference of Mayors and the Council for the New American City released a report during their recently completed conference in Baltimore, MD which highlighted the bleak economic forecast within the nation’s urban settings. The report, U.S. Metro Economies Report: 2011, was completed by Global Insight. The key findings to mayor's report covers a range of issues. The mayors are hoping the reduction in military operations in Afghanistan will translate into increased spending for local economies.

Interesting Read

Obama enters debt talks
By Paul Kane and and Rosalind S. Helderman
The Washington Post

The Politics of the Debt Ceiling Are Too Tempting
By Stuart Rothenberg
Roll Call Contributing Writer

Debt ceiling talks turn to taxes - higher taxes!
By Charles Riley
CNNMoney

Revenue vs. cuts in debt debate
By: David Rogers
Politico

GOP compromise on debt: Cut military spending?
By Lori Montgomery and Paul Kane,
The Washington Post

Debt ceiling deal's ticking clock creates pessimism
By David Rogers
Politico

GOP boosts push for balanced-budget amendment
By Sean Lengell
The Washington Times

House GOP living up to 'Pledge to America'
By Jake Sherman
Politico

Politics

Obama’s 2012 Game Plan
How can the president rev up and mobilize his demoralized liberal base?

by Michael Tomasky
Newsweek Magazine

Hispanics' Ascent Drives Early Moves in 2012 Race
The Wall Street Journal

Why Michele Bachmann is no Sarah Palin
By Chris Cillizza
The Washington Post

Michele Bachmann, evangelical feminist?
By Dan Gilgoff
CNN.com Religion Editor

Housing and Community Development

In Many Cities, Jobs Recovery Could be a Decade Away
By Stephen Gandel

If baby boomers stay in suburbia, analysts predict cultural shift
By Carol Morello
The Washington Post

In California's Rich Farm Country, How the Poor May Get Poorer
By Jens Erik Gould
Time Magazine

Friday, June 24, 2011

Deficit Drama Continues, Impact on Budget Still Uncertain

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s decision to abruptly leave the deficit reduction talks throws another wrench into bipartisan efforts to reach a compromise on reducing federal spending. Republicans hard line on any tax increases or elimination of tax loopholes will make it extremely difficult to reach an agreement before the deadline to raise the nation’s debt limit.

If the Republicans are successful, domestic programs, including affordable housing programs are at risk of deep reductions over the next several years. Talks seemed to be progressing to the point where budget parameters for the next few years were coming into sharper focus. However, Cantor’s action and the Republican’s insistence on receiving a pledge from the president pretty much ensures an agreement will not be reached by the deadline.

The fact that some Members of Congress have expressed an interest in passing a temporary extension is an indication both parties realize while there is some progress being made, and that more time is needed. As budget pressures build, don’t be surprised if fewer groups express a reasonable position on deficit reduction like the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP). AARP stated they would accept reductions in benefits for future retirees until they received push back from Democrats and others.

There simply are too many competing and powerful interests groups yielding too much influence on negotiators. The pressure is squarely on the president. He is feeling the heat from Republicans and Democrats to submit a deficit reduction plan as a condition to having the ceiling raised. He needs to take the lead but not appear to be to pressure from Republic ans.

Republicans are operating from a position of strength For affordable housing programs, this is not a good sign for a number of reasons:

First, federal affordable housing programs have broad but shallow support in Congress and very little support among the general public. Public housing and the Section 8 voucher programs are not popular in local communities. In this political and economic environment, unpopular government programs will be the first targets of budget hawks. Even within the affordable housing community, it will be hard for broad coalitions to stick together when decisions are made about cutting programmatic budgets. At some point, self-interest will take over and the least popular programs will suffer.

Second, any efforts to spruce up the housing market will be targeted to homeownership. While it is becoming harder to own a home with tightening purchasing requirements, homeownership is still a strong indicator of economic progress. If the economy falters, housing production falters, if housing production falters fewer jobs and less upward mobility. In the eyes of too many important people, homeownership is more important to the overall economy than rental housing. When decisions are made about funding housing initiatives, homeownership initiatives will receive priority.

Third, the traditional message which said programs such as the Public Housing Capital Fund, HOME or CDBG are job creators, while technically correct, does not carry the same weight as it did in the past. Local governments are so overwhelmed job creation is only one concern. Cities and counties are getting squeezed top to bottom. From the top they are losing federal funds to address specific concerns. The economy has had negative consequences on families which means local politicians risk losing elections if they raise local taxes. There is not enough revenue to preserve existing jobs, create new ones and meet an array of fiscal obligations. At the United States Conference of Mayors (USCM) meeting in Baltimore, the mayors called for an end to the wars and a redistribution of those resources to local governments. It is not going to happen. Local governments will be squeezed further and in most communities public housing will suffer the most.

The message needs to change dramatically. In 1995, the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO) did, in fact, change the discussion on affordable housing in a dramatic way. The organization called for block granting housing programs and eliminating the Brooke Amendment. NAHRO’s bold step jolted the affordable housing community. By taking the position and calling for the restructuring of housing programs, the decision broadened NAHRO’s political support across both sides of the aisle while forcing legislators, administrators and advocates to rethink how these programs are structured and administered.

NAHRO’s proposals were controversial but the subsequent discussion led to the passage of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998. Unfortunately, the Clinton Administration used its regulatory powers to neuter some of the flexibility provided housing administrators that was in the legislation. Nevertheless, NAHRO’s action is an example of the kind of initiative needed to reshape debate on public housing and do so in a constructive way.

Affordable housing groups need to hire a public relations firm that has the pulse on what Americans will support. Housing programs are slow, expensive and in no-win situations. If the property looks too nice, citizens feel it is a waste of taxpayer dollars on “undeserving” families. If it is not properly maintained, it is a waste of taxpayer dollars. The message must be about people not places. Many years ago NAHRO had ads in its magazine which highlighted the people served in public housing. A variation of that message needs to be the foundation of advocacy efforts.

Without a change in message, affordable housing is facing deep cuts from which some programs may never recover. Look at the groups screaming the loudest: farmer subsidy supporters, defense hawks, protectors of food and children nutritional and food programs. Housing groups cannot compete with them without a compelling argument which puts them, at minimum, at the table when decisions are made.


Interesting Read

Debt talks: Democrat Kent Conrad, Senate budget chair, says $2 trillion not enough
By Lori Montgomery and Rosalind S. Helderman
The Washington Post

Deficit talks in danger as Eric Cantor bails
By David Rogers
Politico

GOP's bold gamble on deficit talks
By David Rogers
Politico

Can Boehner play dealmaker on debt talks?
By Jake Sherman and John Bresnahan
Politico

Obama’s dilemma on the debt-limit talks
The Washington Post
By Michael Gerson

Democrats fret over White House dealmaking
By Jake Sherman and John Bresnahan
Politico

CBO: Debt could grow to double GDP
By David Rogers
Politico

AARP expects Social Security benefit cuts
By Jeanne Sahad
CNN Money

AARP Move on Social Security Could Help Avoid a Train Wreck
By David Gergen
CNN

Conservatives’ spending pledge
By Emily Miller
The Washington Times

Housing and Community Development

White House’s Daley seeks balance in outreach meeting with manufacturers
By Peter Wallsten and and Jia Lynn Yang
The Washington Post

The Indiana Exception? Yes, but...
By Michael Powell and Monica Davey
The New York Times

Eclipsed
Why the white working class is the most alienated and pessimistic group in American society.

by Ronald Brownstein
The National Journal

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

 
Design by Wordpress Theme | Bloggerized by Free Blogger Templates | JCPenney Coupons